They
are the freelancers of terrorism: young men -- and some women -- who
feel alienated from the Western societies in which they live, hold
extremist religious views and embrace violence. They become immersed in
social media, searching out opinions that echo their own.
Now
they can find such opinions with one click and interact with jihadis in
combat thousands of miles away. On Twitter, Facebook and other social
media, they are encouraged or prodded toward joining the cause with
their own act of jihad.
The vast
majority will eschew that final step. Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi in
Garland, Texas, did not. They are the latest examples of a growing
phenomenon that al Qaeda affiliates, and especially the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria,
or ISIS, have encouraged through prolific use of social media and more
traditional forms of "outreach" such as video and audio messages:
"do-it-yourself" acts of terror.
This stream of messaging feeds online radicalization, which "results from individuals being immersed in extremist content
for extended periods of time, the amplified effects of graphic images
and video, and the resulting emotional desensitization," in the words of
one report.
Like-minded
people can find each other very easily online and validate each other's
views. As psychologist Elizabeth Englander put it, "With the Internet, they can always find others who share their views. Suddenly there is a community that says, 'You're not crazy, you're right.' That's very powerful."
Terror
groups do not order or direct the do-it-yourself acts, nor even have
advance knowledge of them. Rather, their supporters keep up a constant
drumbeat of incitement via social media. They harp on acts they deem
hostile to Islam: cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed, coalition airstrikes
in Iraq and Syria, the burning of the Quran.
Taking the bait
In
one or two cases, the seeds they sow will germinate. In a video he shot
days before his attack on a Jewish store in Paris last January, Amedy
Coulibaly asked of fellow Muslims: "What are you doing my brothers? What
are you doing when they continually insult the Prophet?"
Simpson followed more than 400 users, "ranging from pro-IS supporters to hardcore IS fighters
from around the world," said Rita Katz, executive director of the
jihadist monitoring outfit SITE. And "many of them were also following
him."
The
costs to ISIS are minimal: no training, no funding, no risk that
leaders or other operations will be compromised -- just a constant
stream of invective. It's an old distinction -- inspirational against
operational, but taken to a new level. The reward for the terror group
is that some individuals may pledge allegiance to the self-styled
caliph, Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, before they commit a terrorist act, and
that enhances the perception of the group's reach. Simpson did so just
before the Texas attack; so did Coulibaly.
Some
ISIS members and followers, such as Junaid Hussain, who tweeted about
the attack on the Texas exhibition, might best be described as virtual
cheerleaders. They sit in Raqqa or Mosul with a laptop and an Internet
connection, ceaselessly tweeting about perceived injustices and insults
toward Islam, goading their followers.
It was another of these cheerleaders, Mujahid Miski, an American citizen now with Al-Shabaab in Somalia,
who praised Coulibaly and the Kouachi brothers (who carried out the
attack on the Charlie Hebdo office in Paris) in a tweet on April 23. He
also referred to the upcoming exhibition in Texas. "If only we had men
like these brothers in the #States, our beloved Muhammad would not have
been drawn," he lamented.
Elton Simpson, a Miski follower, retweeted the tweet. Perhaps it was then that he decided to act.
"I
believe that perhaps he might have just snapped when he heard about the
cartoon contest," said Kristina Sitton, an attorney who defended
Simpson in 2011 when he was convicted of lying to FBI agents about
wanting to travel to Somalia. There appear to have been direct messages
between Simpson and Miski after April 23, but their content is unknown,
Katz said.
Cheerleaders like Hussain
are not ISIS or Al-Shabaab leaders but tech-savvy foot soldiers often
barely out of their teens. Hussain was convicted in the UK for hacking
into former British Prime Minister Tony Blair's
personal address book and allegedly had a role in "outing" the personal
details of U.S. military personnel. He was formerly known as "TriCk" of
the hacking group TeaMp0isoN.
Avoiding authorities
It's
very difficult for counterterrorism agencies to guess who might be
influenced by such incitement. It's also difficult just to keep track of
so much social media activity, especially when someone frequently
changes handles or user names. Between mid-April and May 3, 2015,
Simpson changed his handle and username at least three times, Katz said.
And the language used is frequently obscure or abbreviated.
In
many societies where free speech is constitutionally protected, it's
often tough to prosecute someone calling for violence or "resistance" in
a foreign country, because authorities have to show that someone else
acted upon such a call. However, from France to Australia, laws are
being beefed up to make incitement in itself a crime, regardless of the
consequences.
There is no shortage of
such incitement. A groundbreaking study by the Brookings Institution
published in March estimated that in the last four months of 2014, ISIS
supporters used at least 46,000 Twitter accounts. They were active and
had an average of about 1,000 followers. Some are indeed hyperactive,
such as those of Hussain and Miski, whose real name is Mohammed
Abdulhali Hassan.
In a detailed analysis of social media profiles among foreign fighters with jihadist groups in Syria
and Iraq, the International Center for the Study of Radicalization
concluded that to them, "social media is no longer virtual: it has
become an essential facet of what happens on the ground."
Most
of these jihadist cheerleaders derive credibility from being in a
conflict zone, such as Syria or Somalia, providing news from the
battlefield in real time, often with videos and photographs. But being
there is not a prerequisite. ISIS supporter @shamiwitness, who sent some
128,000 tweets in English, turned out to be a 24-year-old information
technology worker in Bangalore, India. He had 17,000 followers when he
was exposed and arrested in December of last year. As Hassan Hassan put
it in Foreign Policy, @shamiwitness served in many ways as a " 'virtual inn,' where jihadist travelers linked up."
Another
remote supporter of jihad is Australi Witness, who had, like Miski,
highlighted the Texas event in advance, and commended the attack on it.
He was careful to distance himself from involvement, telling the Sydney
Morning Herald: "I support what our mujahideen in Texas did, but I take
no responsibility for it. Allah commanded them to attack, not me."
His Twitter account has been suspended, but he is thought to have re-emerged, posting a guide on how to get to Syria and Iraq
to wage jihad. And he is quoted as telling the Herald: "This is a war
that will be won through the power of social media. We are winning the
minds of the young generation."
The
International Center for the Study of Radicalization analysis found that
such "disseminators" have been highly influential among foreign
fighters in Syria and Iraq. @shamiwitness was followed by two-thirds of
the foreign fighters analyzed in the center's report, giving him
credibility among would-be jihadists far from the field of combat.
But
for the jihadist groups, these disseminators are a double-edged sword,
answerable to no one. They may have views the hierarchy opposes. They
could be banished from old-fashioned chat rooms, but that's "no longer
possible on Twitter where both fighters and their supporters are able to
engage in wholly unregulated conversations about whatever they please,"
according to the center.
Appealing to the spirit
Some
Muslim extremists in the West may also turn to a new generation of
"spiritual guides" -- the successors of American-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, whose image was the avatar on Elton Simpson's Twitter account.
For
years, when in the UK and later in Yemen, al-Awlaki was careful not to
incite for violence in Western countries nor directly encourage young
men to travel for jihad, even as he justified it as legitimate
resistance.
Gradually, his views hardened, especially after a stint in a
Yemeni jail. His lectures justifying acts of violence in the West have
been highly influential -- on Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hassan and the Boston bombers, among many others.
Australian-born
preacher Musa Cerantonio may have none of al-Awlaki's learned guile,
and much of his social media output is devoted to supporting jihad in
Syria and Iraq. But his language may also feed the animosity of his
audience toward Western governments. At the end of 2013, he posted on
Facebook: "If we see that Muslims are being killed by the tyrant leaders
of the USA then we must first stop them with our hands [ie by force].
This means that we should stop them by fighting them, by assassinating
their oppressive leaders, by weakening their offensive capabilities
etc."
Cerantonio was deported from the Philippines to Australia last year and has been careful to tone down his public utterances in interviews with Australian media since returning home in an effort to avoid prosecution.
But
the International Center for the Study of Radicalization argues that
"whether consciously or not, (spiritual figures) may be performing an
important role in the radicalization of some individuals and retain this
importance among those who later decide to engage in active combat."
Again, for authorities, making the link between cause and effect in a
court of law is an immense challenge.
Twitter
has become more aggressive in identifying and closing ISIS-related
accounts, but as Junaid Hussain has repeatedly shown, it's a game of
cat-and-mouse. And followers quickly inform each other of a new account
handle. Miski is known to retweet Hussain's messages -- and was on his
31st account when he made his call for violence in Garland, says Rita
Katz at SITE.
Katz argues that such
accounts, when they can be identified, must be terminated, writing that
"Leaving accounts like Miski's active on social media for the sake of
acquiring intel is like leaving landmines in a public field to study
their placement."
Others argue that attempts at censorship are both undesirable and futile. In its report "Countering Online Radicalization in America,"
the Bipartisan Policy Center said it would be more fruitful to exploit
"online communications to gain intelligence and gather evidence" while
also tackling the demand for violent extremist messages through
education.
That debate will no doubt
continue, as the dynamics between terror groups and their far-flung
acolytes also evolve, and counter-terrorism agencies scramble to
distinguish intent from bluster among the trillions of social media
messages.
Culled from:
No comments:
Post a Comment
What are your thoughts on this post?